Featured Post

Hewlett Packard: Porters Five Forces, SWOT and PEST

Tuesday, December 31, 2019

Ancient Olmec Culture

The Olmec culture thrived along Mexico’s Gulf Coast from approximately 1200-400 B.C. The first great Mesoamerican culture, it had been in decline for centuries before the arrival of the first Europeans, therefore, much information about the Olmecs has been lost. We know the Olmecs primarily through their art, sculpture, and architecture. Although many mysteries remain, ongoing work by archaeologists, anthropologists, and other researchers has given us something of a glimpse into what Olmec life might have been like. Olmec Food, Crops, and Diet The Olmecs practiced basic agriculture using the slash-and-burn technique, in which overgrown plots of land are burned: this clears them for planting and the ashes act as fertilizer. They planted many of the same crops seen in the region today, such as squash, beans, manioc, sweet potatoes, and tomatoes. Maize was a staple of the Olmec diet, although it is possible that it was introduced late in the development of their culture. Whenever it was introduced, it soon became very important: one of the Olmec Gods is associated with maize. The Olmecs avidly fished from nearby lakes and rivers. Clams, alligators, and various types of fish were an important part of their diet. The Olmecs preferred to make settlements near water, as the floodplains were good for agriculture and fish and shellfish could be had more easily. For meat, they had domestic dogs and the occasional deer. A vital part of the Olmec diet was nixtamal, a special sort of corn meal ground with seashells, lime or ashes, the addition of which greatly enhances the nutritional value of the cornmeal. Olmec Tools In spite of only having Stone Age technology, the Olmecs were able to make several sorts of tools which made their life easier. They used whatever was at hand, such as clay, stone, bone, wood or deer antlers. They were skilled at making ​pottery: vessels and plates used for storing and cooking food. Clay pots and vessels were extremely common among the Olmec: literally, millions of potsherds have been discovered in and around Olmec sites. Tools were mostly made of stone and include basic items such as hammers, wedges, mortar-and-pestles and mano-and-metate grinders used for mashing corn and other grains. Obsidian was not native to the Olmec lands, but when it could be had, it made excellent knives. Olmec Homes The Olmec culture is remembered today in part because it was the first Mesoamerican culture to produce small cities, most notably San Lorenzo and La Venta (their original names are unknown). These cities, which have been extensively investigated by archaeologists, were indeed impressive centers for politics, religion, and culture, but most ordinary Olmecs did not live in them. Most common Olmecs were simple farmers and fishermen who lived in family groups or small villages. Olmec homes were simple affairs: generally, one large building made of earth packed around poles, which served as a sleeping area, dining room, and shelter. Most homes probably had a small garden of herbs and basic foods. Because the Olmecs preferred to live in or near flood plains, they built their homes on small mounds or platforms. They dug holes in their floors to store food. Olmec Towns and Villages Excavations show that smaller villages consisted of a handful of homes, most likely inhabited by family groups. Fruit trees such as zapote or papaya were common in villages. Larger excavated villages often have a central mound of greater size: this would be where the home of a prominent family or local chieftain was built, or perhaps a small shrine to a god whose name is now long-forgotten. The status of the families that made up the village could be discerned by the how far they lived from this town center. In larger towns, more remains of animals such as dog, alligator, and deer have been found than in smaller villages, suggesting that these foods were reserved for local elites. Olmec Religion and Gods The Olmec people had a well-developed religion. According to archaeologist Richard Diehl, there are five aspects of Olmec religion, including a well-defined cosmos, a shaman class, sacred places and sites, identifiable gods and specific rituals and ceremonies. Peter Joralemon, who has studied the Olmecs for years, has identified no fewer than eight gods from surviving Olmec art. Common Olmecs who worked the fields and caught fish in the rivers probably only participated in religious practices as observers, because there was an active priest class and the rulers and ruling family most likely had specific and important religious duties. Many of the Olmec gods, such as the Rain God and Feathered Serpent, would go on to form part of the pantheon of later Mesoamerican civilizations, such as the Aztec and Maya. The Olmec also played the ritualistic Mesoamerican ball game. Olmec Art Most of what we know about the Olmec today is due to surviving examples of Olmec art. The most easily recognizable pieces are the massive colossal heads, some of which are nearly ten feet tall. Other forms of Olmec art that have survived include statues, figurines, celts, thrones, wooden busts and cave paintings. The Olmec cities of San Lorenzo and La Venta most likely had an artisan class who worked on these sculptures. Common Olmecs likely produced only useful art such as pottery vessels. Thats not to say that the Olmec artistic output did not affect the common people, however: the boulders used to make the colossal heads and thrones were quarried many miles from the workshops, meaning that thousands of commoners would be pressed into service to move the stones on sledges, rafts, and rollers to where they were needed. Importance of Olmec Culture Understanding the Olmec culture is very important to modern-day researchers and archaeologists. First of all, the Olmec was the mother culture of Mesoamerica, and many aspects of Olmec culture, such as gods, glyphic writing, and artistic forms, became part of later civilizations such as the Maya and Aztecs. Even more importantly, the Olmec were one of only six primary or pristine civilizations in the world, the others being ancient China, Egypt, Sumeria, the Indus of India and the Chavin culture of Peru. Pristine civilizations are those that developed somewhere without any significant influence from previous civilizations. These primary civilizations were forced to develop on their own, and how they developed teaches us a lot about our distant ancestors. Not only are the Olmecs a pristine civilization, they were the only ones to develop in a humid forest environment, making them a special case indeed. The Olmec civilization had gone into decline by 400 B.C. and historians arent exactly sure why. Their decline probably had much to do with wars and climate change. After the Olmec, several clearly post-Olmec societies developed in the Veracruz region. There is much that is still unknown about the Olmecs, including some very important, basic things such as what they called themselves (Olmec is an Aztec word applied to sixteenth-century dwellers in the region). Dedicated researchers are constantly pushing the boundaries of what is known about this mysterious ancient culture, bringing new facts to light and correcting errors previously made. Sources Coe, Michael D. Mexico: From the Olmecs to the Aztecs. Ancient Peoples and Places, Rex Koontz, 7th Edition, Thames Hudson, June 14, 2013. Cyphers, Ann. Surgimiento y decadencia de San Lorenzo, Veracruz. Arqueologà ­a Mexicana Vol XV - Num. 87 (Sept-Oct 2007). P. 30-35. Diehl, Richard A. The Olmecs: Americas First Civilization. London: Thames and Hudson, 2004. Grove, David C. Cerros Sagradas Olmecas. Trans. Elisa Ramirez. Arqueologà ­a Mexicana Vol XV - Num. 87 (Sept-Oct 2007). P. 30-35. Miller, Mary and Karl Taube. An Illustrated Dictionary of the Gods and Symbols of Ancient Mexico and the Maya. New York: Thames Hudson, 1993.

Sunday, December 22, 2019

The Philosophical Debate On Moral Responsibility - 1690 Words

Philosophical debate on moral responsibility has a long history. Thousands of years, many philosophers have debated on whether human beings are morally responsible for their actions. To answer this question, philosophers use terms like free will, determinism, compatibility and deservingness to help it. The question is still a major issue addressed today. To be morally responsible means to accept praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or omission in accordance with one s moral obligations. People could argue that they have free will or not. According to general knowledge of free will, free will can be defined as the ability to do things on ones own discretion. Thus, in this paper I will argue that humans are morally responsible for their actions. I will prove this by using the concepts of Free will and determinism. Free will in the sense that for humans to be morally responsible for an action, one has to be free and conscious of his or her decision. In the case of Determinis m, the presence of causation and external forces has minimal effect or no effect on moral responsibility. Free will Human beings are morally responsible for their actions because they posess free will. Free will is a choice or a desire to do something of ones accord. According to Paul Edward, a philosopher, when we call an action â€Å"free† we mean that the agent is not compelled or constrained to perform it. (Edward). One might argue that people act in certain ways because they have been drugged orShow MoreRelatedComparing Compatibilism Vs Incompatibilism : A Compatibilist View1332 Words   |  6 Pagesthat determinism implies no free will, or the compatibilists view that determinism still allows for free will. The incompatibilist philosophical thinkers have taken determinism as use of a scapegoat, identifying determinism to infer that human beings are unable to have any free will, thus no moral responsibility for taken actions. Whilst the compatibilist philosophical thinkers have taken a softer view of determinism, holding the view that an agents actions are pre-determined, although th e agent isRead MoreMoral Standing on Abortion1087 Words   |  5 PagesMarch 2014 Moral Standing on Abortion To say that a person has moral standing is to give consideration to his or her wellbeing. According to Robert M. Veatch’s The Basic of Bioethics, moral standing is believed to be â€Å"that humans (at least normal humans) have moral standing [as well as] other animals† (27). Moral standing is determined by the physical or mental capacities of self-awareness or rationality. However, controversy arises when determining when one actually has full moral standing. AbortionRead MoreSocialism And The Economic System1373 Words   |  6 PagesSocialism serves to satisfy many philosophical questions therefore making it an ideal position in the economic justice debate. In looking into this position we find satisfaction in the answers it affords us. Socialism fulfills the innate responsibility of the government to care for its people. Moreover, aside from fulfilling this responsibility, socialism is the economic system that delivers the highest benefit as applied to the whole. Th e importance of these answers is that the primary questionRead MoreAnalysis Of The Philosophical Concepts Of Determinism And Free Will1711 Words   |  7 PagesAnalysis of Free Will The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy defines â€Å"free will† as the discretion to choose between varieties of courses of action.The debate and arguments that surround free will have occupied philosophers for many centuries. Many scholars believe that the concept of free will is connected to the concept of responsibility, guilt, sin and other judgments that apply to the actions that are freely chosen by people. Other philosophers also link free will to the concept of persuasionRead MoreDeterminism Vs. Free Will1341 Words   |  6 Pagesevery event there exist conditions that could cause no alternative event. Free will is a philosophical term describing a particular sort of capacity of rational agents to choose a course of action from among various alternatives. Understandably, the dichotomy between these two concepts is a topic philosophers have debated over for many years. As a result of these debates, a number of alternative philosophical perspectives arguing for the ex istence of free will, namely libertarianism and compatibilismRead MoreCase Analysis And Report : Wilson V. R. Facts1355 Words   |  6 Pagesdismissed the appeal. Mr Wilson appealed once again to the High Court. HIGH COURT: Majority decision: The majority, in reaching its decision, endeavoured to define the principles of manslaughter such that the moral culpability of the accused would be commensurate to their legal responsibility. The majority looked to the nature of manslaughter in English law, where the test to determine the existence of manslaughter was, â€Å"the unlawful act must be such as all sober and reasonable people would inevitablyRead MoreEuthanasia Is The Most Active1548 Words   |  7 PagesNon-voluntary euthanasia is illegal in all countries. Involuntary euthanasia is usually considered murder. As of 2006, euthanasia is the most active area of research in contemporary bioethics. In some countries there is a divisive public controversy over the moral, ethical, and legal issues of euthanasia. Those who are against euthanasia may argue for the sanctity of life, while proponents of euthanasia rights emphasize alleviating suffering, and preserving bodily integrity, self-determination, and personalRead MoreGattaca: A Philosophical Analysis Essay1059 Words   |  5 Pagesgenetic identity in exchange for companionship and free alcohol. As Jerome, Vincent is quickly hired and becomes a celebrated success at Gattaca, America’s leading space station. Poignant and triumphant, Gattaca provides the discerning viewer with a philosophical perspective of the ethics, politics, and realities involved in the lives of both the genetically superior and the naturally conceived. In Gattaca, the metaphysical reality of human free will is articulated through Vincent’s unpredicted achievementRead MoreEssay on Libertarianism1127 Words   |  5 Pagesphilosophers have debated over the presence of free will. As a result of these often-heated arguments, many factions have evolved, the two most prominent being the schools of Libertarianism and of Determinism. Within these two schools of thought lies another debate, that of compatibilism, or whether or not the two believes can co-exist. In his essay, Has the Self â€Å"Free Will†?, C.A. Campbell, a staunch non-compatiblist and libertarian, attempts to explain the Libertarian argument. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;ToRead More The Free Will Debate Essay2989 Words   |  12 Pagesother vital philosophical issues: freedom of action and moral accountability, which is the main reason why the debate is so vital. Simply stated, a person who has free will refers to an individual’s ability to choose his or her route of action. However, animals also appear to suit this measure, further adding to the debate because free will is typically thought to only be possessed by human beings (Broad 1990). Over the years, there has been an extended running controversial debate as to whether

Saturday, December 14, 2019

Understanding The Y2k Bug Free Essays

As the Millennial sun rose over human civilization, in the independent republic of Kiribati, a group of some thirty low lying coral islands in the Pacific Ocean that straddle the equator and the International Date Line, the reality of the Y2K bug became apparent. This long awaited sunrise marks the dawn of the year 2000. Kiribati’s 81,000 Micronesians observed nothing different about this dawn, they only received TV in 1989. We will write a custom essay sample on Understanding The Y2k Bug or any similar topic only for you Order Now (y2ksupply.com) However, those who live in a world that relies on satellites, air, rail and ground transportation, manufacturing plants, electricity, heat, telephones, or TV, experienced a true millennial shift, or not. We finally saw the extent of the networked and interdependent processes we had created. At the stroke of midnight, the new millenium closed the greatest challenge to modern society we have responded to yet. We didn†t experience this event, as chaos or social transformation. I am describing the year 2000 problem, known as Y2K (K signifying 1000). Nicknamed at first â€Å"The Millennial Bug,† increasing sensitivity even escalated the nickname to â€Å"The Millennial Bomb.† The problem begins as a simple technical error. Large mainframe computers more than ten years old were not programmed to handle a four digit year. Sitting here now, safely in the year 2000, it seems incomprehensible that computer programmers and microchip designers didn’t plan for it. Programmers did whatever was required to get a product up and working; no one even thought about standards. This computer bug has been predicted to impact the world anywhere from a minor problem to the end of a civilization. Whichever view you took on the subject it is clear that this bug had a definite impact on the economy. Whichever view anyone took on this issue, didn†t really matter because the point is that everyone thought about it and dealt with the issue in his or her own way. In order to understand the Y2K bug we must first understand what it is. For many years electronic storage was very expensive. In the early days of computing a Megabyte or a million bytes of information could have cost up to $100,000 to store electronically. This same amount of information storage can now cost around ten cents. (Barr) Many programs that are date sensitive will react to this bug in a negative way. A good example of a problem that could occur due to the bug would be that of banking software. In that case one of the software†s functions would be to bill all of its customers with outstanding loans. This program works by sending the bill progressively every month until the loan is paid off. If the computer were to think that it was the year 1900 then none of these loans would have even been made yet and the computer would become unstable or cease to function. Much of this software can be repaired or replaced with new versions, however, some of it is not as easily replaced. A great deal of the code that is causing worry at the moment is actually imbedded in automated machinery. This code can†t be repaired, except by replacing the machinery itself. This code is in many of the machines that run companies, public utilities, and are even in our homes in such appliances as VCRs. This calculation problem explains why the computer system at Marks Spencer department store in London destroyed tons of food during the process of doing a long-term forecast. The computer read 2002 as 1902. Instead of four more years of shelf life, the computer calculated that this food was ninety-six years old. It ordered it thrown out. A similar problem happened recently in the U.S. at the warehouse of a freeze-dried food manufacturer. In September 1998, Datamation magazine estimated that, on average, about 7% of all electronics are date sensitive and In November 1998, PCWeek, another leading trade journal, put the number at 5%. (Gibbons) The main emphasis seems to systems with many chips all working on real time clocks such as manufacturing plants. These systems were estimated at up to 30% not compliant with the Y2K problem. Companies with these systems have had trouble being ready for Y2K because in order to prepare for the problem the affected chips have to be isolated and repaired. In a system with thousands of these chips and little documentation on each one, this is an almost impossible chore. Replacing entire systems can cost millions of dollars and many companies can†t afford the cost of the repair. Billions of dollars were spent preparing for this event and much more will be spent in recovery. Most companies have been addressing the problem for the past few years. Very rarely do we get the chance to watch the entire industry lifecycle, from introduction in the early 90†³s and the decline and death of the industry in the early months of 2000. The entire industry has opened up just to deal with this problem. In the US most mission critical equipment was tested before 1999 and was either compliant or repaired. The systems that caused most concern were things like power grids, telephone networks, and air and land traffic controllers. These systems were of such great concern because some of these computers systems and networks have existed since the late 1950†³s. The fact was that no one could afford to entirely replace these systems, they had to be upgraded to be compliant. What was the impact on Government, Industry, and Small Business? There are several impacts to Government, Industry, and Small Business. Dates that can impact the leap year algorithms, boolean dates, fiscal year dates, calendar dates, and ASCII code dates. There are separate ramifications to the new dates. For the Government, the dates have a major impact across the board. Every Government agency, from Federal to City, will be impacted. The Federal Government uses computers on a daily basis and without them, the Federal Government is not able to operate. Some specific examples are in the Department of Commerce, Department of Defense, and the Department of Justice. The Department of Commerce utilizes computers to run the National Oceanic Atmospheric Association (NOAA) systems that are used to chase Hurricanes. The problem is that several of the computers are used to log different data and use date/time stamping with that data. This data is later analyzed to try and map hurricanes for the future. If the Y2K issues are not resolved, important data will be lost. The Department of Defense also uses computers to a very large extent. This is especially true for the DOD large complex machinery used to defend the country. There are very few parts of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines that do not use computers. Computers are the backbone to DOD and without them, there is a real fear that our armed forces would not be able to defend this country. (Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense) The Department of Justice has an even worse problem. They are charged with keeping track of criminals and federal indictments across the country. Because of the complexity of the laws, if the computers used to keep track of indictments and criminal records are not Y2K compliant, then the Justice system could have criminals cleared of any wrong doing because of a simple date issue. It is well known that if the date or address were wrong on an indictment or a search warrant, anything found because of the indictment or warrant could not be used in court. (Cohen) The Government agency that has had the most influence on the whole Y2K issue was the Internal Revenue Service. Basically the IRS has the greatest concern because they are charged with the duty of collecting revenue from the taxpayers in order to run the country. The theory is that the IRS, through Congress, could influence or scare business, banks, and individuals into awareness. (Chandrasekaran) This awareness translated into the hundred billion or so expenditures that banks, businesses, and individuals spent on being Y2K compliant. Industry had the same basic problems that the Government had. They rely on computers in almost every aspect of the business. From robotic assembly lines to employee payroll, all of industry relies on the computer to run its day to day operation. (Gwynne) The problem that both industry and Government have is that there was no contingency to the Y2K issue. Both industry and Government have several backup systems. The problem with small business is that they rely on the computer to do many of the tasks that employees used to do. In small business, people were employed to handle payroll, marketing, office management, files, record keeping, and profit/loss ledgers. These people were replaced with the advent of the computer. Now any small business could operate without minimal employees. The office manager could now handle payroll, marketing, files, records, and ledgers right on the computer. The computer became the key piece of equipment for the small business. Without the computer, small businesses could not stay in operation. Most small businesses have become dependent on the computer to replace employees. Without a computer, small businesses would need to hire additional personnel and return to paper and pencil to operate. An example may be Nations Bank; it may have its primary mainframe computer, for all its checking accounts, in one central place. There is a hot backup (a hot backup is a main frame computer that records the same exact information that the mainframe computer is recording, but it does not handle any transactions, just records the information) that is located in a different part of the country, say Colorado. In this way, if a major disaster were to devastate California, the hot backup would come on line take over the responsibility of the mainframe. (McMahon) In this way, vital information would not be lost. This was all thought out years before Y2K. Y2K would impact both mainframes (the primary and the backup) and all the data would be corrupted. What did Government, Industry, and Small Business do to combat the Y2K Issues? For both Government and Industry, it was not be a problem to combat Y2K. Both areas, through consulting agencies and internal working groups, developed a series of plans to combat the Y2K issue. The standard procedure is to first do an inventory and assessment on the agency. After the assessment is made, a renovation plan is developed to renovate the different systems. After renovation, a validation phase, where the renovation is tested using the different Y2K dates to ensure that no problems were encountered. The implementation phase is to implement the system into action, and begin watching the system during the actual crossover dates. The cost to perform all of the plans and phases are high. On most major DOD systems, the cost ranges from $100,000 to over $5 Million. For industry, their costs are about the same. It does not matter if the agency does it internally or hires consultants to perform the work. The consumer and/or taxpayer absorb the high costs in industry and/or Government caused by the expenditure on solving Y2K issues. Industry passed the costs to the consumer by increasing its price on the product. The Government modified the budget to get the necessary funds to ensure Y2K compliance. The real problem lies with small business. The plans and phases that were developed by industry and Government must also be accomplished by small business. The problem is that small business does not have the money to expend on the Y2K issue. Small businesses do not have the overhead or capital to afford to test its systems and ensure that Y2K problems do not exist in its machine. This is where the actual computer industry comes into the scene. Since most small businesses do not rely on consultants and do not have a computer expert on the payroll, then small businesses must rely on the software companies to ensure that the computer is Y2K compliant. Marketers quickly recognized the fact that many small businesses would be forced to purchase new hardware, software, and peripherals. Marketers were not afraid to sell replacement equipment that was not affected by this bug. Consultants profited on the fact that many individuals and small businesses were very ignorant on the issue at hand and how many individuals had little to no knowledge of what was occurring in the machine that they were using. Many of these machines could have been upgraded with a small BIOS chip that would allow the machine to function with the new date format. Application software that is used with Windows 98 may not be compliant, making the system non-compliant. Microsoft could not be held responsible for other software packages built by other software companies. In addition, most software companies will not support older versions of its software. An example is that Microsoft does not support Windows version 3.1. This is based on the availability of newer versions of Windows being available to the consumer. So where does this leave the small business? There is Federal and Local assistance available to help small business ensure that the Y2K issue is resolved prior to the actual dates. If the small business did not recognize that it has a problem, then it could not work to fix the Y2K issue in time. By combining their resources and working with the local support, a network of consultants could work together to fix the problem before the actual Y2K dates came. Here it is April 3, 2000, and the lights are on, there†s plenty of water, and the stock market is at a record high. There is widespread suspicion that the Y2K computer bug was no more than the media overreacting and getting people excited for nothing, and Y2K was a big dud. There may be some validity to this theory, but I think the fact is that the problem was reduced by our efforts in making all computers Y2K compliant. Some people believe that disruptions may still occur in coming days as government and industry resume full operations following the minor problems that either were overlooked or were unanticipated. I think the investment in Y2K upgrades, which totaled an estimated $100 billion just in the United States, kept the most important computer systems running. The most serious malfunction so far was when the Defense Department computers temporarily failed to communicate with a reconnaissance satellite. Officials did not acknowledge the breakdown to the media until seven hours after it was discovered, in order not to cause people to panic about one relatively minor Y2K related computer failure. Considering the seriousness with which not only the Pentagon but also almost all other companies took to the possibility of a Y2K malfunction, I doubt that it could have amounted from hype alone. Part of the Y2K panic, of course, came from the fear that computers would do bazaar things such as transfer all our money from our accounts into someone else†s account, or traffic lights would make errors and cause terrible accidents. I agree that that is hype that amounted from the media twisting and predicting the results of Y2K without basing their information on facts. How to cite Understanding The Y2k Bug, Essay examples

Friday, December 6, 2019

Leadership and Management of Early Years

Question: Identify and critically evaluate two or three key priorities essential to the Leadership and Management of Early Years (3-7 years old children) in practice. Answer: Introduction Leadership and management is the key factor to enforce development in the teen and young children. The effective leadership deals with influencing teens to do the right thing and in positive manner. The leader has the quality of leadership to encourage the people to motivate them and eject better productivity and efficiency from the people. On the other hand, the management of human and their behavior is complex issue which requires an effective leadership skill to control their behavior so that can seek higher benefit from education and learning (Page and Millar, 2009). Therefore, leadership and management if goes together then it can beneficial for the people and for the trainers. Moreover, the staff and parents can be able to achieve their goal by guiding and controlling the act of children through leadership and management. The current study will be focusing on the challenges faced in leadership and management in context to children aging 3-7 years. The leadership and management are important for the children to become a better person in future. Therefore, the study will be dealing with different key challenges that are mostly noticed in leadership and management. Further, conclusion will be proposed to sort out the issues in order to bring effective development in the children. Key Challenges Encouraging and facilitating parent partnership The learning provided by parents last forever among the children and it also helps in their development. On the other hand, Carpenter (2005) mentioned that if the parents fail in providing effective learning and guidance in the initial stage of the children then it can doom their life and the children may ruin their life in future. It is evident that due to low income of the parents they may not be able to provide effective learning to their children. Therefore, parent plays important role for the growth and development of the children by providing initial age learning. Thus, children are not able to receive basic learning and their childhood life can get hampered. On the other hand, Digman and Soan (2008) pointed that a teacher or staffs of school or kindergarten can act as a parent to build strong relationship or bonding with the children. Therefore, it can help the teacher to know the requirements of child and understand their mentality so that better learning can be provided. Apa rt from that, Paige-Smith and Rix (2006) opined that parent and teacher partnership is effective for the child growth but if there is lack of bonding then it can directly affect the child mentality or their future growth. Therefore, it can leave a child into depression due to collision and conflict between his parent and teacher. Hence, it can be understood that if there is a conflict then it will hamper child learning and health (Wheeler et al. 2009). Therefore, in my opinion the teachers and parents should try to make a cordial relationship so that a better future can be planned for the children. On the contrary, Ward et al. (2009) discussed that if teacher do not have quality of acting as a parent then they might not be successful in providing as effective as other. Therefore, according to me, the teachers should treat the children as parent, which helps the children to be active and give complete involvement in different activities of the school and develop their skill and knowledge. For example, if teacher act as parent then a child can be more open to them and they can share their thoughts and ideas and better environment can be build for children (Page and Millar, 2009). Moreover, Keynes (1991) stated that the parents are the most important part of the childs life and they can help the children to follow ethical norms of life. Therefore, the parents should develop their teaching and parental skills and learning to guide the children for better future career. For instance, the Pen Green Centre helps the families and their children by providing learning environment such as classes to parent for taking care of the child and understanding the needs of child. Further, it also provide wide array of service such as care and education to the families so that they can take care of their child in more better and effective way (Browne 2004). On the other hand, Holiday Play Scheme and After School Club is valuable for the children above 4 years to have better quality and learning time while playing or doing any other activities (Brooker, 2008). On the other hand, Theory of Wahanau assists in promoting families as a total unit rather than focusing on the individual family member. Therefore, it is effective in proposing a solution that is faced by the families regarding the health and wellbeing of the children (Howes et al. 2008). Thus, it can be concluded that parents and teachers can have great influence on the growth and development of the child. Distributed Leadership between staff Bush et al. (2013) opined that leadership is effective for the children growth and their future prospect. The staff of the school or other learning centre has to integrate their knowledge so that best knowledge and reading can be provided to children. Leadership is important to develop the learning and knowledge of the people that helps them to carry their work in productive way and build friendly environment. However, it has been found that in the recent study that staffs of the educational institution are not taking up their job seriously and their major focus is on earning high salary (Davies and Brent, 2009). Therefore, due to such act child has to suffer and they are not able to gain proper learning and education. The lack of interaction between the staff can affect the leadership practice and child may not be provided better learning environment (Robins and Callan, 2009). For instance, if the staffs of the school had fight for getting the morning shift to teach the children and due to that the negativity, environment of school can be hampered and it can show wrong image about school outside (Caroline and Linda, 2008). Therefore, it can be understood that if there is no interaction and communication between teacher and staff then they may not develop leadership skill to guide and direct the children (JanetMoyles, 2006). Thus, the distributed leadership can be effective for the staff to undertake work collaboratively and provide required learning and support to the children. Within primary school, teachers have to follow the guideline of distributed leadership style. Chapman (2013) acknowledged that it is the first and foremost in leadership practice instead of role, routines, structure and functions of leaders. Interaction with each other between the staffs is an immediate and most defined leadership practice in primary education. Regular interaction between the staffs helps in increasing teaching and learning method (Mullick et al. 2013). In primary schools, literacy co-ordination makes the teacher in providing higher level of learning to learners (Spillane, 2005). Interaction between the staffs helps in generating more functions. However, distributed leadership make the teachers interdependency in primary school environment according to their characteristic. If the staff interdependent with each other, they can delivers learning and teaching easily. Encouraging Reflection in Professional Practice (Staff) Majority of teacher in their profession faced common issues such as understanding of feelings and honesty. According to Kelly and Saunders (2010), entering into teaching professional especially in the 2 to 3 years childrens primary school is very much complex. However, in this framework, taxing is also a big issue in professional development. Nabhani et al. (2012) argued that reflection on the practice is supportive, challenging and structural. As asserted by Flessa (2012), these are the essential part of professional development process in teaching at primary school. Majority of teacher in their profession faced common issues such as understanding of feelings and honesty. These critical approaches identified in teaching and learning. Professional practice in primary school are the thinking and acting over stimulus reaction. From the point of view of social constructive practice, teaching and learning are the interrelated and required to change regarding primary school environment in UK. Southworth (2008) opined that experimental learning plays the major role in transformation the experience into knowledge. Core of learning process is the fundamental of scholar reflection in relation to professional development in learning institute especially n primary school at UK. Tay and Lim (2013) acknowledged that reflection is the way that helps in better understanding about the practitioners. Moreover, it helps in developing knowledge to the teacher in primary school via reconsidering the practice of learning. In the primary school environment in UK it has been often identified that concept of critical reflection regarding management education is now become the core as well as integral part of qualification of trainee teachers. Reflection in the action of primary teachers can be described as interaction which is the main problem that faced by the teacher in their professional practice in 2 to 3 years children primary school. Majority of professional in their teaching and learning in primary school faced challenges in using hidden or tactic knowledge. They are unable to provide safe learning environment to the learners via putting the rule based knowledge into action. Apart from that, development and judgment becomes negative for the teachers in the early aged primary school in UK. From my experience, teachers face complexity in covering the issues of learner due to lack of experience. Wood et al. (2012) argued that making sense is a problem for the teachers of primary school in UK. They are unable to involve their experience and professional knowledge in their profession. In teaching and learning education in primary school in UK, it has been identified that majority of teachers demoralized psychologically and unsound pedagogically (Thro, 2012). Apart from that, it is also found out teachers in primary school unable to meet everyone requirement due to varying degree of needs of the learners. Moreover, in the initial stage of teaching at primary school, some of the teachers missing to interact lot of important things such as primary learning, differentiation of various learning tools, etc. Different approaches sometime demotivate students and teachers were unable to instructions accordingly (Walker, 2010). Moreover, variability among the group of learners is also a key challenge for new teachers in primary school. Most of the teachers are unable to make proper planning for learning to their respected students in UK primary school. Woods et al. (2012) cited that differentiation in lesson is also a potential challenges in teaching and learning at primary school in UK. Lack of experience of teaching and learning in primary school is then major problems for teacher within the primary school environment in UK. In order to standardized teaching and learning, teachers have to develop flexible structure and provide innovative learning experience to the learners in both individual as well as group. Apart from that, constructive intellectuality will be the best technique in challenging learning in primary school. Development of numeracy, literacy and language will be the best methodology in primary school regarding teaching and learning to the children. Conclusion This study is mainly consists the three key priorities that essential in leadership and management of early years in a primary school. Early years learner has fresh mind. Therefore, teachers have to take care with more precious. From the above discussion it has been found out that teacher has great impact on effectiveness of early years in primary school. The dimension of this study identified that teachers has to pay more attention in their learning method and creating positive environment along with open communication. These are observed according to the three critical factors for challenges in primary school in UK. These findings help in emphasizing more to the teacher in their teaching and learning procedure. Thus, with this contribution, teachers in primary school in UK are able to develop higher level of school effectiveness. According to the result, it has been said that teachers training will be the best strategy for providing better teaching to early years learners in primary school in UK. In order to provide teaching and learning in better way, government has to provide training in building attitudes, practices, habits to something professional. It helps in achieving higher-level improvement in terms of teaching and learning to early years in primary school. Reference Browne, A., 2004. Parents and Teachers Working Together. In: Browne, A., and Haylock, D., eds. Professional Issues for Primary Teachers. London: Paul Chapman, pp 85-101. Carpenter, B. (2005) Early childhood intervention: possibilities prospects for professionals, families and children, British Journal of Special Education , 32(4): 176-183. Carroll, M. and McCulloch, M. (2014). Understanding teaching and learning in primary education. London, England: Sage. Chapman, C. (2013). Editorial. School Leadership Management, 33(2), pp.113-113. Dean, J. (2013). Subject Leadership in the Primary School. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. Digman, C., Soan, S., 2008. Working with Parents. London: Sage Publications. Effective leadership and management in the early years JanetMoyles, R. 2006. Maidenhead: Open University Press. McGraw Hill Education. Flessa, J. (2012). Principals as Middle Managers: School Leadership During the Implementation of Primary Class Size Reduction Policy in Ontario. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(3), pp.325-343. Howes, C., et al., 2008. Ready to learn? Childrens pre-academic achievement in pre-kindergarten programs.Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23 (1), pp.27-50. Involving parents in their children's learning - Whalley, M., and the Pen Green Team.,2007. London: Paul Chapman. 2nd Edition. Kelly, A. and Saunders, N. (2010). New heads on the block: three case studies of transition to primary school headship. School Leadership Management, 30(2), pp.127-142. Laar, B. (2014). Primary Heads. New York: Crown House Publishing. Leadership and management in the early years: from principles to practice - Caroline A, Jones.,Linda Pound 2008. Maidenhead: Open University Press. McGraw Hill Education. Leading and managing people in education - Bush, Tony, Middlewood, David 2013 Managing early years settings: supporting and leading teamsEditors- Alison Robins and Sue Callan.,2009. London Sage Mullick, J., Sharma, U. and Deppeler, J. (2013). School teachers' perception about distributed leadership practices for inclusive education in primary schools in Bangladesh. School Leadership Management, 33(2), pp.151-168. Nabhani, M., Busher, H. and Bahous, R. (2012). Cultures of engagement in challenging circumstances: four Lebanese primary schools in urban Beirut. School Leadership Management, 32(1), pp.37-55. Page. A., and Millar, C., 2009. School-parent partnership: a short guide, research and policy for the real world. London: The Family and Parenting Institute. Paige-Smith, A. and Rix, J. (2006) Parentsperceptions and childrens experiences of early interventioninclusive practice? Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, NASEN , 6(6): 92-98. Plowright, D. (2008). Using self-evaluation for inspection: how well prepared are primary school headteachers?. School Leadership Management, 28(2), pp.101-126. Southworth, G. (2008). Primary school leadership today and tomorrow. School Leadership Management, 28(5), pp.413-434. Spillane, J. (2005). Primary school leadership practice: how the subject matters1. School Leadership Management, 25(4), pp.383-397. Supporting transitions in the early years - Liz Brooker. 2008 (electronic resource). Maidenhead: Open University. Chapter-3 Bridging Cultures: home, pre-school and school. Pp. 55- 74. Tay, L. and Lim, C. (2013). Creating holistic technology-enhanced learning experiences. Rotterdam: SensePublishers. The essentials of school leadership - Davies, Brent 2009 Thomas, H. (2013). Steps in Leadership. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. Thro, W. (2012). School finance. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications. Title: Parents and teachers together : partnership in primary and nursery education.Author: Mary Stacey. Publisher: Milton Keynes : Open University Press. Publication date: 1991 Identifier: ISBN0335094368 Walker, M. (2010). Choice, Cost and Community: The Hidden Complexities of the Rural Primary School Market. Educational Management Administration Leadership, 38(6), pp.712-727. Ward, U., Goodliff. L., and Goodliff, G., ed., 2009. Working with Parents in Early Years Settings.London: Sage Publications. Wheeler, H., Connor, J., and Goodwin, H., 2009. Parents, Early Years and Learning: Parents as Partners in the Early Years Foundation Stage. London: The National Childrens Bureau. Wood, P., Spandagou, I. and Evans, D. (2012). Principals' confidence in managing disruptive student behaviour. Exploring geographical context in NSW primary schools. School Leadership Management, 32(4), pp.375-395. Woods, C., Armstrong, P. and Pearson, D. (2012). Facilitating primary head teacher succession in England: the role of the School Business Manager. School Leadership Management, 32(2), pp.141-157.